A few weeks ago a 15-year-old called me “Grandma” for being able to remember when the first Twilight film came out, and I still haven’t mentally or emotionally processed this
Some of y’all haven’t become so disillusioned with your own reality that you spend years of your life daydreaming about entirely made up worlds and people and it shows
anyone else hear about the 22° kill or be killed theory 😳
for those asking, here’s a link that explains it better than i can.
basically it just gives a bunch of examples of how murders took place in countries with 22° planets as well as murderers/murder victims who had 22° placements-
like, India’s chart has a 22° Cancer Moon in 10th, indicating the death of a woman in power. the very first female prime minister of India, a woman named Indira Gandhi, was assassinated by her own body guards.
Jim Jones, the cult leader who drove over 800 of his followers into death, had his sun at 22° of Taurus, which is also the planet that rules his 8th house which of course is associated with death.
A restaurant owner with his 6th house cusp at 22° was murdered by one of his customers, fitting since the 6th house rules work and those we render services to.
So what I’m gathering from this is that the position of anything at 22° can indicate how one kills or is killed… it’s just a theory though.
Omg Jeffrey Dahmer had a 22° Leo Venus in the 8th house along with a 22° North Node….
OMFG John Wayne Gacey had a retrograded juno in scoprio 22°, its also conjunct his 1st house from his 12th house opposite his mars/uranus/saturn conjunction (which he’s know for his shocking, repressed sexuality and violence which he abandoned his wife for. He was also really charm which juno conj. asc are. His juno also squared his mercury in his 3rd house, so he was a charming talker to. I watch kendall rae’s podcast about him and everything makes sense!)
yeah, yeah, i know, academia is an evil bourgeois lair of useless elitist white cishet men writing self-congratulatory articles about nothing and groping their brilliant female students’ arses and so on and so forth, but occasionally, it is prudent to let some of those useless academics - plenty of whom are women and/or poc and/or lgbt nowadays, how shocking, and who’ve spent their lives learning EVERYTHING about a certain subject - explain a text or a concept to you, so that you don’t run around after with a wildly inaccurate understanding of smth like what ‘social construct’ means, or what Nietzsche was all about, or what Freud actually wrote or did or said, or inventing already invented strains of feminism, etc etc etc
oh, and while i’m at it - this whole “academia is useless” is a belief that the far-right ideology has been extremely fond of all throughout the last century or so. just saying.
looks
oh haven’t you heard???? things will get better and you will be okay
lol I’m probably about to be burnt at the stake in a facebook group for my ever unpopular opinion that bi women calling their attraction to women gay isn’t a big deal
“bi women using the word gay casually perpetuates straight people thinking lesbians will sleep with men” straight men literally are going to keep thinking this and it has nothing to do with bi women. bi women didn’t invent homophobia and if they stopped ever using the word gay collectively it wouldn’t magically make straight men respect lesbian sexuality
like imagine unironically saying bi women are responsible for lesbophobia and thinking it’s a woqué take
next time a man says something about trying to sleep with a lesbian, don’t sit there and think “wow, if bi women wouldn’t call themselves gay this wouldn’t happen!” just fucking deck the man. gut him like a fish
some of yall really need to just…. talk to actual bi women
saying bi women’s attraction to men makes them “available” to men is really just… gross. just because they have attraction to men it doesnt mean men have access to them or their identity. bi women love women just as much as lesbians and that’s just a fact. they dont exist for men or for men to consume, they arent available to men or anything like that. they exist for themselves and their identity and attraction is THEIRS and this doesnt take away from the fact that they love women
the fact that people try to make a contest between lesbians and bi women’s love for women by saying one is better or one is more intense or “right”… is so transparent of how you feel about women loving women and it’s gross! just because a bi woman is attracted to men, THIS DOESNT TAKE AWAY THEIR ATTRACTION TO WOMEN. they still love women, and guess what? bi women love women just as much as lesbians. shocking, I know!
pitting two identities against each other when they really have a lot in common is just ridiculous. we should stand by each other in solidarity and understanding instead of this shitty “who loves women more?/who’s love for women is more valid?”
as a lesbian I will always stand by bi women and fight for and with them, and I dont stand for any biphobia on this blog or in my life. let’s make bi women feel loved and appreciated instead of making them feel lesser than because they’re so important to this community and so important overall
Amy Lowell, Sword Blades & Poppy Seed: Miscast II, // Adrian Borda, Love Slowly Kills // Trebor Healey, A Horse Named Sorrow // Mahmoud Darwish, In the Presence of Absence // William Bouguereau, Girl with a pomegranate // Alexis Bates & Logan February, Pomegranate
and I would gladly break it
I would gladly break my heart for you…
for @itifaaq

Jan 11